The largest portal of Israeli and Jewish resources on the web.
Inside ZionTimes
ZT News Service
ZionTimes Library
ZT Editorial Toons
ZT Editorial Toons
ZionTimes Parsha Insights #2 Parsha Insights #2 - (Parsha Beams, Orot HaRav Kook, etc) ZionTimes Parsha Insights #2

Pinchas: The Little OnionPinchas: The Little Onion
Moses expected that one of his sons should inherit him as the leader of the Jewish People, but Hashem had other ideas. What was the nature of their disagreement?

by Rabbi Lazer Brody

"And Hashem said to Moses, 'Choose Joshua, the son of Nun'..." (Numbers 27:18)

Rashi[1] explains that when Moses received the directive from Hashem that Tzelofchod's daughters would inherit their father's estate, he said to himself, “The time has come for me to claim my needs, so that my sons can inherit my lofty position.”

Hashem, who reads hearts and minds, said to Moses, “That's not the thought that has come to My mind, for Joshua is worthy of receiving his reward for his internship, never having left the tent.”

We have here a situation where Hashem and Moses didn't see eye-to-eye. How can we understand the nature of their disagreement? Surely Moses, who the Torah describes as the most humble human who ever walked the face of the earth, wasn't concerned with money, power and influence for his family, having his children “set for life” in inheriting him. Moses must have had a halachically-legitimate reason. What could it have been?

The Gemara relates[2], “Rabbi Yirmiya ben Abba said, 'One fulfills the mitzva of truma[3] by donating one whole small onion and not one half of a large onion. Rabbi Yehuda disagrees and holds that one half of a large onion is preferable...the latter construes that importance is preferable whereas the former construes that wholeness is preferable.” If I'm not mistaken, this was the very disagreement between Hashem and Moses.

“The big onion” alludes to Moses. The word in Hebrew for onion, batzal, is spelled the same way the word for “in the shadow of”, batzel. No one spent more time in the shadow of Hashem than Moses. Since Moses had two sons, Gershom and Eliezer, each can be referred to as “half of the big onion.” On the other hand, the “whole small onion” alludes to Joshua, whose character was flawless and who held himself in utter self-nullification in the presence of his holy teacher Moses. As such, the argument in the Gemara between Rabbi Yirmiya and Rabbi Yehuda is the same argument that Hashem had with Moses: Hashem like Rabbi Yirmiya held the wholeness is the significant factor where Moses like Rabbi Yehuda believed that importance is the significant factor. To this day, the Halacha is like Hashem and Rabbi Yirmiya: if a person wants to eat banana, and on the plate in front of him is a small whole banana or half of a huge gorgeous banana, he makes the blessing on the small whole banana.[4]

There are other places in Torah where wholeness precedes importance or rank. Even though Korach was next in line in the order of inheritence of the Kehati dynasty, Elitzaphan ben Uziel was picked as the president of the Kehat Levites. Even though Menashe was Joseph's firstborn, Jacob granted the spiritual inheritence to Ephraim, Joseph's second son. Many tzaddikim, such as Rebbe Menachem Mendel of Rimnov, passed the reins of their leadership to their understudy rather than to their son, preferring “wholeness” to “importance”.

Intensive effort in refining character, perseverance in Torah study and dedicated internship under one's teacher overrides the importance of lineage. This is the way Hashem decides. Not everyone can be a blue-blood, the son of a great rabbinical dynasty, but everyone can earn the crown of refined character, devotion to Torah and dedicated understudy.

Imagine that being born into an advantageous situation from birth is an escalator. Most people don't have "escalators", but if they run up the stairs three at a time they can reach the top faster than the person on an escalator. Those who rely on their blue-blood and silver spoon are like those who stand static on the escalator, relying on it to take them to the top. Those without the escalator know that they have to hustle and do the work themselves to make it up the stairs. So how is it that such greats of our generation such as Rabbi Chaim Kanievski shlit'a are the sons of great people (his father was the holy Steipler Rov, osb"m)? All his life, Rabbi Chaim has been running up his escalator full speed. No wonder he has reached the top.

All Hashem wants from us is that we use our resources that He gives us to the utmost. Each minute of the day is an irreplaceable gift to be utilized the best way possible. Even the life of a little onion can be sweet.


[1] - Rashi's elaboration of Numbers 27:15, “Yifkod”
[2] - Berachot 39b
[3] - The 2% of a crop that is donated to a Cohen
[4] - See Tosaphot, Berachot 39b, “Mevarech”

Rabbi Lazer BrodyRabbi Lazer Brody was born in Washington, D.C. in 1949. After receiving his bachelor's degree in agriculture from the University of Maryland in 1970, he moved to Israel and joined the Israel Defense Forces regular army, and served in one of the elite special-forces units. He is a decorated combat veteran of two wars and numerous of counter-insurgence and anti-terrorist missions on both sides of Israel's borders.

Rabbi Brody is the English-language editor of Breslev Israel's highly popular English-language website at, and the founder and director of Emuna Outreach. Between Breslov Israel and Emuna Outreach, he devotes his time to spreading emuna and particularly the teachings of Rebbe Nachman of Breslev around the globe.

"Lazer Beams," Rabbi Brody's award-winning daily web journal, has been instrumental in helping tens of thousands of people around the globe find joy and fulfillment in their lives.


Email Login
ZT Book Reviews

More Book Reviews

Home | Torah Portion | Growing each day | Today in Jewish History | Free E-Mail | Shopping | Contact Us

© 2002-2018 - All Rights Reserved.